Constitutional Law – Implied Consent 
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, March 15, 2010
By admin
Tags: Constitutional Law
Where the results of a urine test were used to revoke a driver’s license under the implied consent law; and the driver argues that urine tests are less accurate than blood and breath tests; we conclude that the implied consent law, which authorizes three separate forms of chemical testing to determine a driver’s alcohol concentration, did not violate the driver’s right to equal protection because the law withstands the rational-basis test, and as applied to the driver, the law is not unconstitutional because the driver himself chose to submit to a urine test.
We reject the additional claims of error.
Affirmed.
| Case Number | A08-0951 |
| Case Name | Zieglmeier v. Commissioner of Public Safety |
| Court | Court of Appeals |
| County | Ramsey County |
| Category | Constitutional Law |
| Type | Unpublished Civil Opinions |
| URL | http://www.minnlawyer.com/pdf/OPa080951-0309.htm |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)


POST A COMMENT