-
Home > Opinions > 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals > RESTITUTION – Garnishment
RESTITUTION – Garnishment
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, February 8, 2010
By admin
Where a defendant found guilty of filing false tax returns was ordered to pay restitution as a condition of supervised release and the defendant moved to quash the government’s garnishment proceedings, the District Court did not err in ordering garnishment or denying in forma pauperis status. Judgment is affirmed.
| Case Number | 08-2428/2615 |
| Case Name | U.S. v. Young |
| Court | 8th U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS |
| District | Appealed from the District of North Dakota |
| Category | RESTITUTION |
| Type | CRIMINAL OPINIONS |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/email/offer?url=http://minnlawyer.com/2010/02/08/restitution-garnishment/&title=RESTITUTION – Garnishment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://twitter.com/home/?status=RESTITUTION – Garnishment <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>+http://minnlawyer.com/2010/02/08/restitution-garnishment/)
POST A COMMENT