-
Home > Opinions > Court of Appeals > Medical Malpractice – Expert Review
Medical Malpractice – Expert Review
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, February 8, 2010
By admin
Tags: Medical Malpractice
Where plaintiff sued a former medical provider who had treated him for a mental illness; plaintiff did not file an affidavit of expert review as required by Minn. Stat. sec. 145.682; and plaintiff claims that section 145.682 should not apply to an indigent plaintiff; we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the medical-malpractice action in light of the clear statutory mandate.
We reject the additional claims of error.
Affirmed.
| Case Number | A09-1031 |
| Case Name | Forciea v. Lockman |
| Court | Court of Appeals |
| County | Hennepin County |
| Category | Medical Malpractice |
| Type | Unpublished Civil Opinions |
| URL | http://www.minnlawyer.com/userfiles/image/OPa091031-0202.htm |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/email/offer?url=http://minnlawyer.com/2010/02/08/medical-malpractice-expert-review/&title=Medical Malpractice – Expert Review <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://twitter.com/home/?status=Medical Malpractice – Expert Review <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>+http://minnlawyer.com/2010/02/08/medical-malpractice-expert-review/)
POST A COMMENT