-
Home > Opinions > 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals > IMMIGRATION – Removal; Motion to Reopen; Changed Country Conditions
IMMIGRATION – Removal; Motion to Reopen; Changed Country Conditions
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, February 8, 2010
By admin
Tags: Immigration
Where an immigration judge denied an application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the CAT for an immigrant from Uzbekistan, the motion to reopen was properly denied because she did not demonstrate changed country conditions that would excuse the untimely filing of her second motion. Petition denied.
| Case Number | 08-3167 |
| Case Name | Averianova v. Holder Petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals |
| Court | 8th U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS |
| District | Petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals |
| Category | IMMIGRATION |
| Type | CIVIL OPINIONS |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/email/offer?url=http://minnlawyer.com/2010/02/08/immigration-removal-motion-to-reopen-changed-country-conditions/&title=IMMIGRATION – Removal; Motion to Reopen; Changed Country Conditions <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://twitter.com/home/?status=IMMIGRATION – Removal; Motion to Reopen; Changed Country Conditions <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>+http://minnlawyer.com/2010/02/08/immigration-removal-motion-to-reopen-changed-country-conditions/)
POST A COMMENT