-
Home > Opinions > 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals > CIVIL PRACTICE – Certification For Appeal; Adequacy Of Explanation; Finality
CIVIL PRACTICE – Certification For Appeal; Adequacy Of Explanation; Finality
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, February 8, 2010
By admin
Tags: Civil Practice
Where a District Court certified a case for appeal under Rule 54(b) but the court’s conclusory order did not explain how judicial economy would be served or why there was no just reason for delay, the certification was an abuse of discretion and the appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
| Case Number | 09-1989 |
| Case Name | Clark v. Baka, et al. |
| Court | 8th U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS |
| District | Appealed from the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Category | CIVIL PRACTICE |
| Type | CIVIL OPINIONS |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/email/offer?url=http://minnlawyer.com/2010/02/08/civil-practice-certification-for-appeal-adequacy-of-explanation-finality/&title=CIVIL PRACTICE – Certification For Appeal; Adequacy Of Explanation; Finality <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://twitter.com/home/?status=CIVIL PRACTICE – Certification For Appeal; Adequacy Of Explanation; Finality <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="/wp-content/themes/mnlaw/images/goldkey.png" border=0/></span>+http://minnlawyer.com/2010/02/08/civil-practice-certification-for-appeal-adequacy-of-explanation-finality/)
POST A COMMENT