Attorney Conduct – Withdrawal without Substitution 
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, December 7, 2009
By admin
Where counsel represents plaintiffs who filed op-in consent forms for a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act; counsel attempted to contact certain opt-in plaintiffs, without success, over a period of months; these opt-in plaintiffs were warned twice of counsel’s intent to withdraw; and the court can see no reason to delay ruling upon the motion to withdraw until after it rules on defendant’s motion to compel; the District Court grants counsel’s motion to withdraw, without substitution, as counsel for certain opt-in plaintiffs.
| Case Number | Civ. 09-516 |
| Case Name | Luiken v. Domino |
| Court | U.S. District Court |
| District | Minnesota |
| Category | Attorney Conduct |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)


POST A COMMENT