ERISA – Disability Benefits 
Posted: 1:00 am Mon, October 5, 2009
By admin
Tags: ERISA
Where an employer’s long-term disability insurer approved a cardiologist’s claim; the cardiologist had worked under a contract paying him $500,000 per year as base compensation in exchange for a designated number of on-call days, and had been paid an additional amount for any additional days the cardiologist was on call; and the disability plan did not include “overtime pay” as part of the calculation of “basic monthly earnings”; the District Court concludes that the insurer reasonably concluded that the cardiologist’s additional-call time fell within the commonly understood definition of overtime pay, and the insurer’s determination that the additional-call time should be omitted from “basic monthly earnings” was consistent with the clear language of the plan.
| Case Number | Civ. 08-973 |
| Case Name | Khoury v. Group Health Plan, Inc. |
| Court | U.S. District Court |
| District | Minnesota |
| Category | ERISA |
![[Print]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://minnlawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)


POST A COMMENT